Financial literacy within the Black community tends to focus heavily on skills like budgeting, saving, investing, and actively avoiding debt. This concept is widely advocated to empower Black individuals to achieve their financial aspirations, such as homeownership, education financing, retirement security, the creation of generational wealth, and addressing historical racial wealth disparities.
Despite initiatives, programs, and educational resources to help Black people improve their financial knowledge, the data still shows that these racial wealth gaps are not letting up and are widening.
Within the general framework of financial literacy, it centers obtaining assets that often involve specific conditions or requirements. Banks assess factors like your income, employment history, credit score, debt, and income to determine the loan amount and the annual percentage rate you qualify for. These assessments typically adhere to conventional models and established criteria.
One major challenge and barrier is that when it comes to evaluating financial factors (often referred to as the “5 C’s“: character, capacity, capital, collateral, and conditions), there is a lack of differentiation and tailored measurement for Black consumers and their financial behaviors and environmental influences. This means that these standardized ranking systems do not consider the unique historical and institutional challenges that Black communities have faced, including limited access to wealth, historical employment barriers, job discrimination, and unequal wealth distribution. As a result, these standardized processes may not accurately measure the creditworthiness or financial potential of Black consumers, inadvertently perpetuating financial inequalities and exclusion.
When credit assessment processes do not adjust to any of the specific social, political and economic factors affecting Black consumers, it perpetuates financial inequities by limiting their access to credit, fair terms, and financial opportunities. This further widens the wealth gap and hinders economic mobility for these communities, when institutions fail to consider these conditions that can lead to inadequate risk assessment.
In my comparison of financial literacy to financial inclusion, I noticed that financial literacy primarily focuses on improving individuals’ knowledge of finance and decision-making skills. It promotes technical concepts like education on budgeting, debt management, investment, and retirement planning while also emphasizing consumer protection. However, to effectively put this into practice and to benefit from such techniques, it is necessary to have economic opportunities, pathways and reliable income sources to manage, balance, and invest beforehand.
For instance, full-time temporary workers on average earn 41% less in wages than formally employed workers, and they are susceptible to wage theft. This issue disproportionately affects Black and Latinx individuals, as they are overrepresented in this group in the labor force and are exploited and targeted by certain industries. You can learn more about this data here.
When discussions about financial literacy often revolve around traditional financial products, services, and strategies, like using a 401k for long-term wealth building, these options become unattainable and out of reach for the majority of the overrepresented group of Black workers in the ‘temp’ workforce as an exemplary reference. Many of the people who fall into this group are not hired for full-time positions, do not have income stability, and lack employer-sponsored healthcare benefits and retirement plans. Even among the minority demographic of higher-earning Black professionals, studies reveal the significant impact of the “Black Tax,” which substantially reduces their earnings and savings.
Considering the abundance of available data—advocating for Black consumers to adhere to existing measurements and to learn and implement techniques that were originally designed as gatekeeping mechanisms without addressing the discriminatory barriers inherent in these measurements can pose the following significant risks:
Shifting Blame On A Whole Community
When consumers are encouraged to adapt, it can shift the responsibility for overcoming discrimination onto the victims of that discrimination. This “blaming the community” mentality obscures the systemic issues that create discriminatory barriers and unfairly places the burden on marginalized groups to navigate those barriers with limited resources.
Normalization Of Discrimination
By asking consumers to learn and practice discriminatory systems, it normalizes these practices and perpetuates the status quo. It sends the message that the system is acceptable as it is, rather than acknowledging the need for reform.
Institutional Gatekeeping
Encouraging adaptation can maintain institutional gatekeeping, where organizations and systems continue to resist and dodge change. It discourages innovation and reform, reinforcing the discrimination as “status quo”.
Reinforces Bias
Current measurements and techniques might be influenced by bias and systemic discrimination. Encouraging consumers to follow these guidelines without acknowledging their exploitative nature or offering alternative solutions can perpetuate and validate these biases.
Undermines Calls for Change
It can undermine efforts to push for meaningful change and reform within systems that are discriminatory. Instead of acknowledging the need for updates and more equitable measures, it sidelines and distracts from these important discussions.
Perpetuates Inequities
The act of adaptation can lead to further disparities and inequities, where marginalized groups may be compelled to accept and adjust to unfair terms, interest rates, or conditions in order to access financial products and services.
In essence, promoting consumer compliance with existing discriminatory measurements, eligibility criteria, and techniques can unintentionally sustain and strengthen discriminatory barriers. As an alternative, this is why it is important to focus on addressing the root causes of discrimination and to strive for more inclusive and equitable financial systems, technologies, and processes instead.
Inclusive finance is all about expanding access to capital and financial services for underserved populations. It can include offering financial products such as basic financial services, specialized micro-loans, lending programs, flexible insurance, and cost-effective remittance options, that leverages specific technology developed to reach remote areas.
The core goal of financial inclusion is to remove barriers that surround financial access, which would improve the financial well-being of those typically excluded from traditional banking systems and business models.
Financial inclusion is a powerful approach that addresses discrimination, wealth disparities, and systemic inequities. It does so by prioritizing access to financial services through more flexible banking models. This not only reduces bias but also empowers individuals, facilitates wealth accumulation, increases resources, stimulates economic growth, redefines creditworthiness criteria for certain groups, encourages entrepreneurship, redistributes wealth, and then incorporates aspects of financial literacy later in the practice.
The inclusive finance framework seeks to advocate for policy changes, contributing to social and economic stability and mobility. It actively addresses and challenges the root causes of financial disparities while maintaining a primary focus on promoting innovation for more equitable and prosperous outcomes among underserved populations.
Breaking down older processes to discover new opportunities is the pathway forward. Financial models guided by culturally relevant data must also consider cultural and regional distinctions, as these factors undeniably impact financial behaviors, trust, economic conditions, regulations, technological access, historical context, socioeconomic influences, risk management, preferences, and communication expectations.
Creating solution-oriented business models to account for these variations is key to firms and Senior leadership having access to accurate and unbiased financial insights, the right contextualized information and strong strategies to invest in and build out services and products that can address the diverse requirements and needs of Black consumers globally.
Over the past two decades, Matthew C. Meade has made quite a name for himself in corporate finance, supported by his impressive career in financial services as a Fortune 100 Executive, Author, Mentor, and Wall Street Veteran. Matthew’s professional journey is propelled by a true mission. He passionately works towards breaking down barriers, encouraging wealth creation within the Black community, and mentoring the next generation of finance leaders.
Alongside his mission-driven approach, he excels in data analysis and crafting metrics through statistical analyses, with an established background in developing a range of solution-oriented digital financial products. Given his proficiency in numbers, customized analytics, strategy, and tailored product design, I wanted to get his professional opinion on the potential benefits of integrating financial inclusion into discussions and practices related to financial literacy.
I asked Matthew five questions, and here are his responses:
Based on your expertise, what advice would you give to policymakers, financial institutions, and individuals looking to embrace inclusive finance as a more effective way of promoting financial literacy?
I still believe financial literacy should be taught in schools as it’s an important concept that impacts individual’s entire lives. In order to promote both financial literacy and inclusion, a comprehensive approach is needed that requires policy makers and financial institutions to work collaboratively with vulnerable populations in effort to create more sustainable programs and initiatives.
My advice highlights the following three key aspects that I view as effective steps to take towards improving financial literacy:
- Policymakers should develop and enforce regulations, allocate resources for financial education, encourage participatory collaboration, and invest in digital infrastructure.
- Financial institutions must begin to create transparent, accessible and inclusive products, offer financial education, incorporate specialized digital technologies, practice responsible lending, and fairly partner up with underserved communities and entrepreneurs.
- Individuals can boost their engagement and readiness by taking the initiative to educate themselves, making an effort to budget, developing savings habits, handling credit responsibly, and seeking professional guidance when necessary.
How can technology and digital solutions be leveraged to enhance inclusive finance, and what considerations and criteria’s are important in implementing these technologies to measure the various aspects of financial well being specifically for the Black community?
Technology is a powerful tool that can educate and empower people on a broader scale through automation and self-service options. Various technologies can be employed to expand digital literacy efforts, particularly in underserved areas, eliminating barriers to accessing digital financial services. Embracing the convenience of mobile banking apps and online platforms is a starting point. Developing partnerships centered on innovation can contribute to greater engagement, ultimately leading to more impactful outcomes.
Financial institutions can team up with Black tech entrepreneurs and innovators to create advanced digital solutions that promote financial inclusion and provide new levels of access. Another consideration involves directing efforts and investments towards technology and innovation, resulting in more user-friendly and accessible financial products and services. Lastly, measuring customer engagement to understand their needs is important for building the most optimal solutions.
How do you think certain lending practices and financial products and services can be more tailored to the financial history of Black consumers?
“The best products satisfy an unsatisfied need.”
To meet an unfulfilled need, it’s advisable to start by gathering and analyzing data on the financial experiences, backgrounds, and requirements of a diverse consumer base. This data will then shape policy, direct the product development process, and ultimately fulfill the identified need.
Decision-makers who integrate this perspective into the design of lending practices for financial institutions have the potential to cultivate more sustainable financial products. This aligns with my recommendations, placing emphasis on action in the following areas:
- Credit Scoring Reform: These institutions can develop alternative credit scoring models that incorporate factors like rental and utility bill payments, going beyond traditional credit histories methods.
- Affordable Housing Financing: Services can be created to expand affordable mortgage programs with flexible eligibility criteria and lower down payment requirements, supporting community land trusts for housing stability.
- Small Business Lending: The introduction of additional micro-loan programs for underrepresented small businesses, featuring favorable terms such as lower interest rates and extended repayment periods, would be beneficial for Black consumers.
- Access to Savings and Investment Products: Banks can create low-fee and high yield savings accounts and provide investment education to empower Black individuals throughout varying communities to save and build wealth.
- Community-Based Financial Services: Policymakers and civic leaders can initiate the establishment of community-focused banks and credit unions that are rooted in the neighborhoods they serve. This can result in a more thorough understanding of their customers’ distinctive financial needs.
What are the potential risks associated with promoting inclusive finance, and how can they be mitigated to ensure the financial stability of individuals and communities?
Inclusive finance can be a profitable model for banks, but it does carry some minor risks, such as:
- Liquidity Risk and a Single Financial Service Provider: This risk can be minimized by promoting diversification. Through strategic partnerships and effective communication outreach, consumers can be encouraged to use multiple financial service providers. This reduces systemic risks, as observed with the collapse of First Republic Bank and Signature Bank.
- Market and Economic Risks: Diversifying the types of financial services to include savings, credit, insurance, and investment products will contribute to the preparedness of individuals and communities during economic downturns.
- Operational and Liquidity Risks for Financial Institutions: This can be mitigated by making sure that financial institutions implement adequate risk management practices, maintain liquidity buffers, and have contingency plans in place. Regulators should also closely monitor these institutions to prevent systemic risks.
How can governments, financial institutions, Black finance professionals and non-profits collaborate to promote a more modernized and inclusive finance system, and what lessons do you think can be learned from these partnerships?
Effective collaboration and communication among governments, financial institutions, diverse finance professionals, and non-profits are critical for establishing a modernized and inclusive financial system. Such partnerships can magnify advocacy efforts, bringing about significant industry changes to address barriers faced by Black communities. Additionally, they play a key role in promoting diversity and driving economic empowerment. Together, these entities can create lending programs for minority-owned businesses, implement diverse hiring practices, offer community-based financial education, push for diversity and inclusion, and support policies setting the foundation for fair access to financial services.
Such strategic collaborations would enable access to capital, improve talent development, create new ways of engaging with overlooked communities, and encourage regulatory support, all of which are necessary to create a more inclusive and digitized finance sector.
In addition to the expressed opinions in this article, it’s important to recognize that when navigating this subject, approaching it with a data-driven mindset is recommended. If you’re a financial literacy advisor or professional passionate about financial education, integrating an analytical perspective into your discussions can act as a potent catalyst for innovation and effective problem-solving. This approach encourages thinking beyond the limitations of existing practices, and by leveraging new perspectives through observation, it can deepen understanding of more systematic concepts and their practical applications, inspiring new ways of learning and innovating.
Read the full article here
